Negative Effect On The Present English Literature Essay
All three of the texts concerned ab initio present the reader or audience with the ways in which the yesteryear continues to hold a negative consequence on the present. In Seamus Deanes Reading in the Dark we see the storytellers past inhibit his place in society and do the mental impairment of his female parent. The subjects of the past coming back to stalk the nowadays are besides prevailing in Brian Friel ‘s ‘Translations ‘ , Jimmy Jack Cassie is destroyed by his compulsion with the Ancient yesteryear and Manus ‘ is oppressed by his love for his ain state ‘s yesteryear. Heaney, nevertheless is slightly more equivocal in his positions, he blames certain parts of the yesteryear for jobs in the past yet seems concerned with maintaining Ireland ‘s yesteryear sacred.
Seamus Deane, in ‘Reading in the Dark ‘ , presents the thought of the past playing as a barrier to come on in the present. This is first seen in ‘Haunted ‘ after the storyteller ‘s brother warns him to remain off from another character, Grenaghan, because he believes he ‘has bad blood in him ‘[ 1 ]. Seaman has suggested that Deane ‘s usage of blood imagination could be used to put the tone for the novel[ 2 ]. It could be argued that the tone Deane efforts to put is a tone of hopelessness and futility. This is because the characters in the novel will be everlastingly tainted by their ain blood. In this sense the history of the characters is what holds them back from developing and come oning. This thought was reflected in Irish society at the clip, as Sean J. Connolly asserts ‘throughout the twentieth century the Irish were peculiarly sensitive to the history of an person ‘s household ‘[ 3 ]. Furthermore Deane ‘s perennial mentions to ‘blood ‘ in the earlier sketchs could besides be used to make a fateful sense of the force and struggle that we see in ‘After ‘ with the beginnings of the ‘Troubles ‘ , a period of bloody struggle between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland between the 1960s and 1990s.[ 4 ]Therefore it could be argued that the manner in which the storyteller is unable to decide his jobs with Grenaghan because of his yesteryear could microcosmically stand for Ireland, this is because the struggle during the ‘Troubles ‘ was a consequence of deep-seated differences in the history of the Republic and Northern Ireland[ 5 ]which is similar to the struggle between the storyteller and Grenaghan.
Similarly to Deane, Brian Friel ‘s ‘Translations ‘ portions the impression of the past playing as a barrier to come on in the present. Friel demonstrates this through the character of Manus, a square instructor at a hedge school in the rural outskirts of Ireland, Baile Beag. Hedge schools were illegal constitutions which aimed to educate the peasantry by learning classical topics in Irish[ 6 ]. Despite being offered a better paid occupation at the freshly opened National school, Manus is ab initio loath to accept the offer, ‘I could n’t I ca n’t travel against him ‘[ 7 ]. One reading of the ‘him ‘ Manus refers to is that it is Hugh Manus ‘ male parent. Manus ‘ uses his male parent as an alibi because his male parent besides says that he is traveling for the occupation. However, an alternate reading could reason that Manus is really mentioning to Ireland as a whole when he refers to ‘him ‘ . This is because the although the National schools offered better installations and rewards than the Hedge schools they were really merely a manner for the British to Anglicise Ireland since, in contrast with the Hedge schools, it was compulsory that all topics were taught in the English linguistic communication.[ 8 ]Therefore it could be suggested that Manus is loath to travel for the new occupation at the National school because he sees them as a menace to Ireland ‘s heritage and wants to continue Ireland ‘s yesteryear. In the same mode as Deane it can besides be argued that Manus acts as a microcosm for Ireland much in the same manner as the storyteller does in ‘Reading in the Dark ‘ , the manner in which they cleaving to the ideals of the past prevents them from doing any existent advancement in the present.
However, the thoughts of Deane and Friel that Ireland ‘s yesteryear is responsible for its deficiency of advancement in the nowadays is non precisely shared by Seamus Heaney in ‘Opened Ground ‘ . Alternatively, Heaney proposes the thought that Ireland is really held back in the present by its ties with Britain in the past, we see this in verse form, ‘The Toome Road ‘ . This verse form possibly relates to a childhood experience of Heaney when he was merely a immature male child. He watched the American soldiers on military exercisings in the Fieldss along the roads nearby his childhood places. The forces were fixing for the Normandy invasion of 1944.[ 9 ]However, ‘The Toome Road ‘ relates this event to a immature male child ‘s brush with armored armored combat vehicles of the British Army. The storyteller ‘s tone is full of bitterness towards the armored combat vehicles, ‘How long were they nearing down my roads, As if they owned them? ‘[ 10 ]. The usage of ‘my ‘ is peculiarly personal, it implies a sense of misdemeanor and deep-seated bitterness, as Neil Corcoran remarks, ‘The genitives are the signal of the indignant native challenge to the colonising attacker ‘[ 11 ]. Furthermore it could besides be argued that the usage of ‘how long were they nearing ‘ refers to the deep historical struggle between the Irish and British since its initial colonisation in the twelfth century[ 12 ]. This thought could be farther developed by analyzing the construction of ‘The Toome Road ‘ , ‘Sowers of seed, erectors of keystones… O charioteers, above your hibernating guns, It stands here still, stands vivacious as you pass, The unseeable, untoppled navel. ‘[ 13 ]Heaney ‘s usage of the eclipsis signals the alteration in the clip that the verse form is set. The verse form makes the passage from the clip of the storyteller to the clip of the initial British invasion into Ireland. This is suggested by Deane ‘s mention to the ‘untoppled navel ‘ . An ‘omphalos ‘ is a long standing artifact from Ancient Greece[ 14 ]and it could be argued that it is symbolic of the Ireland of old. In this sense it means that the British will ne’er be able to to the full colonise Ireland because the spirit of Ireland, represented by the navel, will ne’er be destroyed. Therefore it could be argued that this long-standing struggle of the yesteryear between Ireland and Britain will go on to forestall any advancement for Anglo-Irish dealingss in the present, we can see this through the manner in which Ireland is still partitioned with the division between the North, which remains loyal to the British Crown and the self-declared Republic in the South.
It could besides be argued that the yesteryear does non merely move as a barrier to come on in the present but instead it has a clear damaging consequence on those in the present. The clearest illustration of this is in Deane ‘s ‘Reading in the Dark ‘ . This is suggested by the devastation of the female parent and the storyteller as a consequence of the load of the household ‘s history. Deane presents this devastation utilizing cataphoric mention between the two sketchs ‘Stairs ‘ and ‘Mother ‘ . In the gap sketch, ‘Stairs ‘ the storyteller appears to be really childly, unconcerned by his female parent ‘s description of the stepss, ‘How ‘ll you acquire down? How do you cognize? What if it does n’t travel? ‘[ 15 ]. The perennial inquiring from the storyteller creates a tone of childlike artlessness. It could be argued that Deane ‘s purpose in making this guiltless tone is to fuel the storyteller ‘s wonder for the storyteller ‘s yesteryear. In bend this creates a relationship between the storyteller and the reader which means that the blunt contrast of tone presented in ‘Mother ‘ resonates more with the reader. This is because in ‘Mother ‘ the destructive effects of the past become much more evident to both the storyteller and the reader, ‘but now with a existent shade crouched around her, sometimes shouting out in an incoherent noise ‘[ 16 ]. Deane ‘s usage of monstrous imagination, ‘incoherent noise ‘ implies a sense of confusion and underlines the devolution of the female parent between ‘Stairs ‘ and ‘Mother ‘ . This besides creates a sense of poignancy for the storyteller because as Ann Skea remarks, ‘the storyteller knows that finally the secrets of the yesteryear that haunt his female parent will bit by bit come to stalk him excessively ‘[ 17 ]. Therefore we can deduce that the storyteller will endure a similar destiny to his female parent when the secrets of the yesteryear are passed on to him.
In contrast with ‘Reading in the Dark ‘ the manner in which the yesteryear has a damaging consequence on the present is voluntary. Whereas the storyteller ‘s female parent has the load of the yesteryear imposed on her through no mistake of her ain, Jimmy Jack Cassie in ‘Translations ‘ alternatively attempts to get away to the yesteryear ; an action which finally leads to him traveling insane. Jimmy is foremost introduced to the audience as the ‘infant prodigy, sitting by himself, contently reading Homer in Greek and smiling to himself ‘ .[ 18 ]This would non hold been unusual for the Irish, because as Brian Arkins provinces, ‘schools, such as the one depicted in Translations, taught Greek and Latin and preserved Ireland ‘s long and fruitful association with the Classical tradition. ‘[ 19 ]At this point, Jimmy ‘s involvement in Ancient Greece seems really guiltless ; peculiarly the manner in which he is seen to be ‘contently reading and smiling to himself ‘ would show an image of tranquility and harmoniousness for the audience. This artlessness rapidly deteriorates as Jimmy appears to be wholly lost in the yesteryear. This is best demonstrated by the phase waies in the 3rd act, ‘He attempts the gesture he made before: standing to attending, the fleeting cramp, the salutation, the face raised in offended ecstasy – but the organic structure does non react expeditiously this clip – the gesture is monstrous ‘[ 20 ]. The phase waies present a really upsetting image for the audience, the usage of the oxymoronic ‘pained ecstasy ‘ emphasises Jimmy ‘s agony and the hurting he is sing. Furthermore the manner in which the ‘body does non react expeditiously ‘ suggests that Jimmy is no longer at that place, it is as if his head has become detached from him. Friel so compounds this image with the following set of phase waies, ‘As Jimmy says those last lines he is shouting, seeking to maintain his balance – he slides to the floor his dorsum against the broken cart ‘[ 21 ]. The ‘broken cart ‘ is an anaphoric mention to the initial phase waies in the gap of the drama, ‘Around the room are broken and disregarded implements: a cart wheel, a conflict of hay, a churn, etc. ‘[ 22 ]In this sense it implies that the yesteryear has such a damaging consequence on Jimmy by the terminal of the drama it has wholly consumed him and he has really become a portion of the ‘broken and disregarded implements ‘ around him.
Heaney besides explores the construct of the past holding a damaging consequence on the present. However, in comparing with Deane and Friel, Heaney does non propose that the yesteryear has a straight detrimental consequence on the present but instead it is the cyclical nature of the yesteryear that amendss those in the present. This is best demonstrated in his verse form ‘Punishment ‘ . In which Heaney writes of the find of a immature miss ‘s organic structure exhumed from a bog in Jutland[ 23 ]. Initially, the verse form addresses this miss in the past utilizing graphic anatomical imagination ‘neck ‘ , ‘nipples ‘ and ‘ribs ‘[ 24 ]. This imagination accentuates the exposure of the miss by depicting her organic structure parts with promote sensitiveness and failing. The verse form so makes the passage from past to the present when Heaney appears to turn to the problems within Ireland. He parallels the penalty of the bog miss to Irish adult females during the problems, ‘in Ireland Irish misss who married British soldiers were viciously killed by Irish Revolutionary Armies ‘[ 25 ]. Heaney besides adds a 3rd bed to the verse form, comparing the barbarous penalty that he rejects with suchA abhorrenceA to the offenses of the IRA against BritishA sympathizersA in Ulster. He relates the powerful, hard emotions of unfairness with the sense of ferociousness created by the struggle of The Troubles. In an interview with the Paris Review, Heaney stated that ‘It ‘s a verse form about standing by as the IRA pitch and plume these immature adult females in Ulster. But it ‘s besides about standing by as the British anguish people in barracks and question centres in Belfast. It ‘s about standing between those two signifiers of insult ‘[ 26 ]. Therefore it could be argued that in Punishment, Heaney presents the reader with the inquiry of whether anything has really changed since the ancient miss ‘s decease, and hence whether or non it is the cyclical nature of the yesteryear which has caused this harm.
Although at first it does look that all three of the authors suggest that the yesteryear does hold a negative consequence on the present upon farther analysis all three of the texts can besides be interpreted instead. For illustration, Deane ‘s ‘Reading in the Dark ‘ can besides be depicted as proposing that the yesteryear can educate those in the present. This is demonstrated by the manner in which the Church efforts to suppress the storyteller ‘s cognition in an effort to forestall him from sabotaging their authorization, ‘they would n’t learn us even if they could. ‘[ 27 ]This line can be understood in two different ways. From a position critical of the Church it could be argued that the storyteller ‘s thirst for cognition of the yesteryear is what enables him to derive a better apprehension of his household ‘s jobs, nevertheless the Church enterprise to forestall certain instructions of the yesteryear in order to maintain the Irish people less educated so that they do n’t dispute their authorization. This thought is besides suggested by the manner that the storyteller refers to the Church as ‘they ‘ ; this suggests the storyteller sees the Church as a corporate organic structure and that the storyteller is against the Church instead than a portion of it. It could be argued that Deane is citing events that were go oning when he was turning up. For illustration in the 1960s the Catholic Church came under examination after it supported the support of public censoring and maintained its ain list of prohibited literature until 1966[ 28 ]. Hence it can hence be argued that the yesteryear may non hold a negative consequence on the present but instead we can larn from the yesteryear.
Unlike Deane, an alternate geographic expedition of Friel ‘s ‘Translations ‘ suggests that the yesteryear can non be erased. Friel presents this thought through the manner in which the English effort to Anglicise Ireland by interpreting the Irish topographic point names into English. However, Owen, a indigen from Baile Beag whose occupation it is to interpret the names for the English repeatedly, although about unaware of it, makes errors in his interlingual renditions, ‘what kind of a interlingual rendition was that Owen? , Did I make a muss of it? ‘[ 29 ]. It could be argued that the manner that Owen mistranslates Lancey is to inquiries the premise that the English make that a state ‘s yesteryear can merely be erased. Friel ‘s usage of dramatic representation summarises this impression during the conversation between Yolland and Owen in Act Two, ‘They explode with laughter, Owen pours drinks, their lines overlap. ‘[ 30 ]It could be argued that the manner in which their lines are seen to ‘overlap ‘ suggests that the English will ne’er be able to pass over out Ireland ‘s yesteryear and Ireland ‘s civilization but instead they should esteem it and seek to accommodate with it.
From Heaney ‘s verse form ‘Bogland ‘ the reader can derive an alternate penetration into Heaney ‘s apprehension of Ireland ‘s yesteryear. In Bogland we see that Heaney views the land as cardinal to an apprehension of the Irish state on the whole. It could be argued that Heaney is proposing Ireland ‘s yesteryear is sacred ; beds of history are laid down upon beds, like peat in a bog. ‘Our unfenced state, Is bog that keeps crusting, Between the sights of the Sun ‘[ 31 ]. The bog Acts of the Apostless as a metaphor for Ireland ‘s history, Heaney implies that Ireland ‘s history is a deep, dark, and long one. This is suggested by the concluding lines of the verse form which portray Ireland ‘s history as space, ‘The wet Centre is bottomless ‘ . This suggests that Ireland is a strong state with strong history and it will go on to persist, this impression is summed up by Karin Sanders who suggests that Bogland is ‘connected to persistence in the Irish mind ‘ . This is besides suggested by the mention to the ‘the Great Irish Elk ‘ , the moose is normally referred to in Irish folklore and is symbolic for the strength and power of Ireland.[ 32 ]Furthermore it could be argued that the history of Ireland will go on to give the Irish people their strength, this is suggested by the line, ‘The land itself is sort, black butter ‘ , and the usage of butter could propose that it nourishes the Irish people. Therefore utilizing ‘Bogland ‘ as an illustration we can reason that Heaney feels that Ireland ‘s history is sacred and that it needs to be everlastingly preserved.
To reason, I would reason that Deane, Friel and Heaney agree that the yesteryear has a negative consequence on the present. All three of the authors emphasise a demand to travel on for the yesteryear, by refering ourselves excessively much with the yesteryear we lose a clasp on world and our ain lives. However, as an anon. critic has stated, ‘the past continues to maintain the present alive ‘ , we can still larn from our errors in the yesteryear instead than reiterating them, and finally, the yesteryear can ne’er be erased.
Quote count: 428 words