Social effects of trade liberalization on Nigeria

Introduction

Despite the entry of some literature corroborating the positive association between trade liberalisation and poorness relief, it remains a complex ordeal to clearly province if trade liberalisation is positive or negative for developing states.

Winters et Al ( 2004 ) , Reimer ( 2002 ) , Stiglitz & A ; Charlton ( 2005 ) , George ( 2010 ) identified assorted connexions between trade liberalisation and poorness relief, such as the monetary value and handiness of goods, factor monetary values, grosss from export, inducements for invention and investing, short term hazard, and development of footings of trade.

The long-established statement in support of a positive relationship between trade liberalisation and poorness relief which exhibits the socio-economic and welfare impact of trade liberalisation. First is the statement that many hapless people work in the agricultural sector where trade deformations are most high, therefore the consensus is that trade liberalisation could pave manner for higher planetary monetary values of agricultural and could take to higher production and net incomes in 3rd universe states ( Panagariya 2005 ; Chang 2005 ; Deaton 1999 ) .

The foregoing nevertheless could give negative results ; which can come in diverse ways such as, lessening in import responsibilities which might cut down usage grosss leting a cut in authorities populace grosss ensuing in a psychiatrist of authorities transportations ( Dornbusch 1992 ; Busse & A ; Gro?mann 2004 ) .Also, the footings of trade can be negatively influenced from the position of import monetary value additions or export monetary values bead emanating from austere competition in export markets. Raising trade barriers in a peculiar state besides paves manner for addition in import competition which leads to the reallocation of productive factors which induces short term hazards and accommodation costs ( Edwards 1993 ; Stiglitz et Al 2006 ; Lall et al 2006 ) .

The Economic Partnership Agreements ( EPA ) nevertheless reflects the statements for and against trade liberalisation. Since 1975 the African, Caribbean and Pacific group ( ACP ) of states have gained non-reciprocal discriminatory entree to the European Union Market ( Price Water Cooper house 2007 ) .The EPA is fundamentally aimed at making a Free Trade Area between ACP states and the European Union ( Mete 2006 ) . The virtues and demerits of such an understanding has been widely debated by different bookmans with entries such as ; possibilities of heightening economic growing, technological development increased trades and the negative facets as loss of duty grosss which are major portion of authorities gross, riddance of custom responsibilities on imports from trade with the European Union and diminution in domestic authorities gross, decrease of public assistance benefits, revenue enhancement reforms and austere economic policies, undermine regional integrating, poorness exasperation, de-industrialization of developing states, allowing European corporations right over 3rd universe economic systems ( actionaid.org ; Seekat 2010 ; Bouet 2008 ) . The scrutiny of the history of Nigeria is important before traveling into full analysis of the impact of trade liberalisation.

1.1 Historical Background

Nigeria is a state with over 140million people, ranking as the highest populated African state. It attained independency in 1960 from the British authorities. Despite periods of instability ( Military regulation / dictatorial regulation ) , in 1999 Nigeria returned to democratic regulation ( Bureau of African Affairs,2010 ) . The state at independency was dependent on agribusiness, but suddenly shifted to the development of petroleum oil which led to the partial forsaking of agribusiness at the disbursal of rough oil geographic expedition and development doing it the 6th largest manufacturer of rough oil in the Earth and 5th provider of rough oil to the United States in 2010 ( US EIA 2010 ) .

Nigeria possesses a history of short term trade policies ; this are largely aimed at procuring balance of payments viability and sweetening of exports.Other awaited utilizations include, industrialisation policy, employment creative activity, self sufficiency policies to advert but a few ( Mete 2006 ) . Trade policies in Nigeria can be categorized under pre Structural Adjustment Programme ( SAP ) epoch, station Structural Adjustment Programme epoch policies ( Mete 2006 ) .

One of the recent characteristics of Nigeria ‘s trade policy Centres on certain merchandise prohibitions or import prohibitions, while duty in 2002 have declined, the figure of merchandises that are capable to prohibitions have increased significantly. Below in Fig 1, are the list of merchandises in diverse sectors that have been banned. The extent to which these prohibitions were enforced remains questionable, as there were freedoms granted. It is estimated that 8 per centum ( US $ 1.8 billion ) of the official imports in 2006 were in duty classs that had a complete prohibition and another 1 per centum in duty class that had partial prohibitions ( Adriamananjara et al 2009 ) .

Apart from the prohibition or prohibition list, Nigeria sustains high duties in a figure of sectors. The Nigerian duty agenda though simplified in 2005 and aligned with the ECOWAS Common External Duty with the maximal rate reduced by 50 per centum which is above the ECOWAS proposed rate of 20 per centum. Some merchandises nevertheless still abide by the 50 per centum duties such as sugar, rice, coffin nails, plastics, tyres, vehicles to advert but a few. The deduction of this in the short term implies that if trade liberalisation is adopted in line with the EPA, it would likely take to welfare cut downing and trade recreation ( Busse & A ; Gro?mann 2004 ) .

Fig 1: Sectoral prevalence of import prohibitions in Nigeria

Beginning: Adriamananjara et Al 2009

Cardinal Economic Indicators and Trade flows

Get downing with the empirical analysis which gives a unsmooth position of societal and economic indexs of Nigeria and some West Africa states every bit would be represented by some information ‘s. As would be seen in Fig 2 as reflected in the appendix, most of the ECOWAS states to which Nigeria belongs, have a comparatively low income degrees which is measured by the Gross National Income per capita ( GNI ) . Nigeria for case has a Gross National Income ( GNI ) of US $ 1,190 with Buying Power Parity ( PPP ) of US $ 2,070.Ghana for case has the same GNI as Nigeria, but the PPP of Ghana is lower than that of Nigeria, with Ghana holding a PPP of 1,530 a small below that is the PPP of Benin Republic which is 1,510. An scrutiny of Fig 2 ( see appendix ) reveals that there are disparities in the GNI and PPP of ECOWAS member states ( World Bank 2010 ) .

Besides, the Human Development Index ( HDI ) for Nigeria is among the lowest in the Earth, with other members of ECOWAS holding low HDI. Nigeria ranks 142 in the Earth in footings of HDI ranking and a composite indices of its HDI value of 0.423 ( UNDP study 2010 ) .

The overall existent GDP increased by 7.23 per centum in the first one-fourth of 2010 against the 4.50percent in the corresponding one-fourth of 2009 as shown in Fig 5 below. The 2.73 per centum addition in Real GDP growing in the first one-fourth of 2010 is accumulated from the addition in the production in the petroleum oil sector of the economic system ( nigerianstat.gov ) .

Fig 5: Real GDP growing ( Q1-Q4,2009-2010 )

Beginning: nigerianstat.gov.ng

Methodology and Data

Since the chief purpose of the survey is to analyze the impact of trade liberalisation on the economic system of Nigeria every bit good as its public assistance, the mutualities can be known through the application of a Computable General Equilibrium ( CGE ) theoretical account.

CGE theoretical account combines the application of economic theory and empirical informations to make a practical tool for the geographic expedition of economic policies, like alterations in duties and their impacts on the economic system. They utilize mathematical expressions that represent the behavior of several economic agents runing from consumers, authoritiess, sectors, and factors of production ( Krugman & A ; Obstfeld 2000 ; Bouet 2008 ) .The economic constructions combined together creates an accounting system which allows that all resources restraint are accounted for, and theoretically, the flow through and feedback impacts of policy alterations. In this survey, the Global Trade Analysis Project theoretical account ( GTAP ) database would be utilized in researching the deductions of many-sided trade understandings from the position of the EPA on Nigeria.

3.1 Outstanding characteristics of the GTAP theoretical account

The GTAP theoretical account is depicted as a multi-country, multi-commodity theoretical account that is utilized for comparative inactive analysis of trade policy issues ( Hertel & A ; Tsigas1997 ) . The theoretical account considers the undermentioned characteristics ; the regional family from which the income of factors, duty grosss and revenue enhancements signifies the consumer side. Regional family is categorized into the undermentioned ; private family outgos, authorities outgos and nest eggs, the variable of ingestion of private family therefore can be examined by using the non-homothetic Constant Difference of Elasticity ( CDE ) map ( Cline 2004 ) .

This is applied by delegating a representative manufacturer for each sector in a state or part ; the representative manufacturer makes important determinations to work net incomes by using factors of production and produces a individual sector end product. However, manufacturers could besides jump primary factors for each other, the alternation possibility is represented by using the Constant Elasticity of Substitution ( CES ) functional signifier. In this instance, intermediate goods are assumed to be in fixed proportions. In the instance of agricultural merchandises, husbandmans make determination on land allotment, thereby intermediate inputs are produced locally or imported, while primary factors are immobile. Internationally traded goods or exports are differentiated by the state or part of beginning ( Dimaranan et al 2006, Bouet 2008 ) .

Armington ( 1969 ) entry can be applied to the foregoing, this implies that wheat or any agricultural merchandises imported from the other parts of Sub-Saharan states is distinguishable from wheat imported from the European Union, this amounts to merchandise flows that have their ain distinguishable monetary value ticket. The virtue of Armington ‘s entry is that it takes into consideration the bilateral trade flows alongside bilateral trade policies, which can be used in analysing trade penchants that trades with developing states ( Hertel & A ; Tsigas 1997 ) .

The GTAP theoretical account adopts two planetary establishments ; the conveyance sector and the planetary bank sector, the conveyance sector reduces cost based on Cobb-Douglas engineering and production map ( Barnett 2007 ) . The planetary bank nevertheless receives nest eggs from the full parts and buys investing in goods in the full part based on the expected rates of return. The nest eggs are chiefly used on investing that are nest eggs driven, in the inactive GTAP theoretical account nevertheless current investing is perceived as non act uponing economic activities through its impacts on forms of production in the capital goods production sector in each part represented ( Hertel & A ; Tsigas1997 ) . The planetary bank besides assures that planetary trade revenue enhancements generate imported intermediate inputs, extra revenue enhancements can so be situated either on domestic or either applied at differential rates that separate against imports and nest eggs ( Hertel & A ; Tsigas1997 ) .

In this instance, the public assistance alterations are measured by Equivalent Variation ( EV ) , revenue enhancements are included besides in the GTAP theoretical account at several degrees, with the classification of revenue enhancements as represented by production revenue enhancements from intermediate or primary inputs or end products ( Hertel & A ; Tsigas 1997 ) . Trade policy instrument base for import or export subsidies or either revenue enhancements, the common characteristic in most African states is unemployment and a low homo development index. This addresses the incompatibility sing general equilibrium of full employment factors of production, hence in this survey modifying the GTAP theoretical account to suit the unemployment of skilled labor in Nigeria. The foregoing would be attained by delegating the minimal pay rate, and leting the volume of employment of unskilled labor adapt to it. This nevertheless might present an accommodation in the existent pay in the labor market.

3.2 Data and survey simulation

The survey is based on GTAP 7.0 informations base with an sum of 113 parts in the Earth, African database and 2004 state informations for Nigeria. The new version of GTAP has updated national, economic, although the regional trade informations ‘s are disjointed. GTAP has besides integrated trade penchants, specific duties aboard non -tariffs barriers, the expansion of the European Union to 27 members and the remotion of export subsidies on agribusiness. The GTAP database besides includes 39 parts, 30 are African parts and the 9 others are aggregated parts aboard 57 sectors.

The current survey nevertheless aims at analyzing the socio-economic impact of the EPAs from the single state degree, the GTAP informations for Nigeria would be applied. The trade goods of Nigeria as represented in the GTAP 7, would be reduced from the 57 sectors to 13 wide sectors as shown below in Table 1and 2 ( in the appendix ) .

3.3 Policy Scenarios

The survey examines the of import issues sing the consequence of the EPAs on trade, GDP, footings of trade, employment and public assistance in Nigeria from an single state position. The simulation therefore involves full remotion of import duties and duties tantamount to bilateral non duties, raising of prohibition on certain merchandises. The scenarios include:

European Union ( EU ) -Nigeria: if Nigeria eliminates its duties on 50 per centum of its imports from the EU 27, while the EU is supposed to allow responsibility free entree to all African Caribbean and Pacific ( ACP ) merchandises to its markets while go toing to the issue of sensitive merchandises.

If EU -Nigeria 80 per centum reciprocation: this is similar to the first scenario, but the difference is that Nigeria reciprocates tariff riddance on 80 per centum of imports arising from the European Union.

EU-Nigeria ( reciprocality in full of discriminatory duties ) : FTA or Free Trade Agreement between the EU-27 and ECOWAS from the position of the EPA dialogues. The ensuing consequence leads to full reciprocality of discriminatory duties from both sides ; which would be estimated by imitating a complete, symmetrical remotion of imports protection.

Nigeria lifts prohibition: if Nigeria lifts its prohibition on certain goods that have been banned late or antecedently.

The simulation would concentrate on the four experiments and would be carried out by standard GTAP closing which includes variables such as end product, monetary values, factors of production, accommodation to external dazes. The selected experiments are besides extended to unemployment closing, where the lower limit pay for unskilled labor in developing states are fixed and the attendant consequence is re-establishing alterations made in footings of the measure of unskilled labor.

The mention experiment of full reciprocality between both parties is repeated by the lift on prohibition that allow a permutation of duty grosss to take to loss of gross, Value added Tax ( VAT ) on private ingestions or income revenue enhancement. This would uncover the public assistance effects of the EPA.

4 Simulation Consequences

Duty gross impact

The impact on financial gross showed in the Tables 3 to 3.3 below, exhibit that by imitating distinguishable scenarios without turn toing financial compensation, sums to a lessening in authorities gross in Nigeria. Since the EPA expects a financial compensation, it leads to issues such as alteration addition in revenue enhancement on private ingestion within the VAT system, aboard lost duty grosss in the procedure of liberalising trade between EU and Nigeria. From the scenario, if the duty gross is non changed, it leads to immense transportation of grosss from EU to Nigeria, so the footing is happening the correct duty gross expression to run into the demands of EPA. If prohibitions are lifted nevertheless it leads to more transportation of grosss from Nigeria to the EU.

4.1 Change in Trade Patterns

Table 3 shows the per centum differences in trade forms sing the EPA at the sectoral degree for imports and exports.

Table 3: Changes in Export all scenario represented

Volume of exports ( per cent )

Scenario 4 1,54

Scenario 3 4,37

Scenario 2 2,89

Scenario 1 1,78

Beginning: Writer Simulation

Table 3.1 Changes in Import all scenario represented

Volume of imports ( per cent )

Scenario 4 38,1

Scenario 3 24,1

Scenario 2 8,4

Scenario 1 6,1

Beginning: Writer Simulation

Table 3.2 Change in trade good export-EU & A ; Nigeria FTA ( US $ 1000000s )

Scenario

Agricfood

Agric goad

Natural Resources

Crops

Livestock

Servicess

Fabrics

industry

Light Mnf

Sce. 4

54.5

1.74

4.12

6.1

7.1

-4.15

1.75

-28.41

169.38

Sce.3

956.4

0.00

-5.11

-2.14

-0.08

-9,00

-7.15

-18.30

120.30

Sce 2

88.5

0.03

367.03

527.13

8.71

-65.42

-18.84

-634.38

198.20

Sce 1.

-7.24

0.00

1,876

-12.62

-289.30

-78.37

-238.41

-58.39

-483.20

Table 3.3 Change in trade good export-EU & A ; Nigeria FTA ( US $ 1000000s )

Scenario

Agricfood

Agric goad

Natural Resources

Crops

Livestock

Servicess

Fabrics

industry

Light Mnf

Sce. 4

148,34

0.04

0.06

20,00

346,56

23,5

-9.80

-12.04

20.4

Sce.3

65,34

0.00

0.00

23,7

-7.21

-7.45

-7.69

-24.4

11.5

Sce 2

25,1

0.01

0.01

48,00

-87,24

89.75

435.68

338.00

2289

Sce 1.

489,3

0.00

0.01

66,7

-0.98

245.83

125.80

583.79

901.93

Beginning: Writer Simulation

Employment and Welfare impacts

The standard GTAP theoretical account premise makes usage of full use of resources ; this might non be utile in the instance of Nigeria, particularly in footings of unskilled labor which is in surplus. The GTAP simulation discloses that public assistance might be affected by reallocation of bing resources, monetary value of imports and exports as affected by footings of trade consequence, public assistance may be influenced comparatively by the sum of resource gifts, public assistance may besides increase diverseness of net flows from the state of beginning and finish.

Conclusion/Policy deductions

The GTAP simulation has disclosed trade liberalisation as:

taking to either a alteration in construction of the economic system or reforms: this is evidenced in the current degree of duties and prohibition on importing of certain merchandises in Nigeria. Adoption of FTA from the proviso of the EPA would take to a structural accommodation in a state without strong establishments and corruptness.

Having a trade recreation and dumping consequence on Nigeria: lifting prohibitions on importing, leads to dumping and promoting the closing of domestic houses that can no longer vie once more with cheaper merchandises imported

Arousing a displacement in trade forms which in the long tally would weaken regional integrating, with Intra trade in ECOWAS melting off bit by bit, Nigeria trading with the EU strongly retracts inter-trade within ECOWAS and as such might take to diverseness in growing and economic construction both internally and externally ( the other members of ECOWAS are structurally affected ) .

an impact on public assistance from the position of occupation creative activity for the unskilled labor in agricultural sector, nevertheless a passage to industry green goodss skilled labors through preparation of resources, which in the long tally leads to employment enlargement and technological promotion in production.

Might contribute to growing diverseness in the part: following trade liberalisation as represented by the EPA would take to gainers and also-rans in certain sectors. As a consequence of trade recreation, the competitory advantage of different economic systems differ, as such the net income border from different states compared to their export or import per centum yearly might take to diverseness.

Mention

Actionaid International ( N.D ) Trade traps, why EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements present a menace to Africa ‘s development, accessed 7th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //eprints.lancs.ac.uk/34763/1/Trade_traps.pdf

Andriamananjara, S, Brenton, P, Erik con Uexkull, J, & A ; Walkenhorst, P. ( 2009 ) Measuring The Economic Impacts Of An Economic Partnership Agreement On Nigeria, World Bank Library, accessed 7th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-4920

Armington, P. ( 1969 ) . A theory of demand for merchandises distinguished by topographic point of

beginning. IMF Staff Papers 16: 159-178.

Bureau of African Affairs ( 2010 ) Background Note, Nigeria ; accessed 6th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2836.htm

Busse, M, Borrmann, A & A ; Gro?mann, H. ( 2004 ) The Impact of ACP/EU Economic Partnership Agreements on ECOWAS Countries, Discussion paper 294 ; HWWA – Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Hamburg.

Bouet, A. ( 2008 ) . The expected benefits of trade liberalisation on World Income and Development, ‘Opening the Black Box ‘ of Global Trade Modeling, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington.

Chang H.J. ( 2005 ) . Why developing States Need Tariffs. How WTO NAMA Negotiations Could Deny Developing Countries ‘ Right to a Future.OXFAM, South Centre.

Cline, W. R. 2004. Trade policy and planetary poorness. Washington, D.C. : Institute for

International Economics.

Deaton, A. ( 1999 ) . ‘Commodity Prices and Growth in Africa, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 13, No.3, p. 23-40.

Dimaranan, B, Ianchovichina, E & A ; Martin, W. ( 2006 ) Competing with Giants-Who Wins, Who loses? World Bank, archives, Accessed 9th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //siteresources.worldbank.org/INTDEBTDEPT/Resources/468980-1206974166266/4833916-1206974192224/Chapter3DancingWith2006.pdf

Dornbusch R. ( 1992 ) ‘The Case for Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries ‘ . Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.6, No.1, p.69-85.

Edwards S. ( 1993 ) ‘Openness, Trade Liberalization, and Growth in Developing Countries’.Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.31, p.1358-1393.

George, C. ( 2010 ) . The Truth About Trade: The Real Impact of Liberalization, London: Zed Books.

GTAP Database, ( N.D ) GTAP African Database, accessed 6th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/databases/Africa/default.asp

Hertel, T.W & A ; Tsigas, M.E ( 1997 ) Structure of GTAP, accessed 7th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/86.pdf

Krugman P. & A ; M. Obstfeld ( 2000 ) International Economicss: Theory and Policy, 5thed, Addison-Wesley-Longman.

Lall S. , J. Weiss and J. Zhang ( 2006 ) . ‘The “ Sophistication ” of Exports: A New Trade Measure ‘ , World Development, Vol.34, No.2, P. 222-237.

Manson, N. , Ogujiuba, K. , Adeola, A. ( 2004 ) The impacts of Trade Liberalization on Poverty in Nigeria: Microsimulations in a CGE Model, A proposal for poorness and Economic Policy ( PEP ) Research Network accessed 5th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.pep-net.org/fileadmin/medias/pdf/files_events/3rd_dakar/Manson_Nwafor.pdf

Milanovic, B. ( 2005 ) . Worlds apart: Measuring international and planetary inequality.

Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.

Mete, F. ( 2006 ) Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Environment in Developing States: The Case of Nigeria, Journal of Developing Societies Vol.1, No.22, p.A 39-56.

National Bureau of Statistics Nigeria ( 2010 ) Revised 2009 and Estimates for Q1-Q2,2010, Gross Domestic Product for Nigeria, accessed 7th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/ext/latest_release/GDP_Q22010.pdf

Panagariya, A. ( 2005 ) , ‘Agricultural Liberalisation and the Least Developed Countries: Six Fallacies ‘ , The World Economy, Vol.28, No.9, P. 1277-1299.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, ( 2007 ) Sustainability Impact Assessment of the EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements. PricewaterhouseCoopers, Paris.

Reimer, J. J. ( 2002 ) Estimating the poorness impacts of trade liberalisation. GTAP

Working Paper 20. West Lafayette, Ind. , U.S.A. : Center for Global Trade Analysis,

Purdue University.

Sekkat, K. ( Market Dynamics and productiveness in Developing states ; Economic Reforms in the Middle East and North Africa, Springer.

Stiglitz, J & A ; Charlton, A. ( 2005 ) Fair trade for all ; how trade can advance development, Oxford University Press.

Stiglitz, J.E, Ocampo.J.A, Spiegel, S. , Ffrench-Davis, R, & A ; Nayyar, D. ( 2006 ) Stability with Growth: Macroeconomicss, Liberalization, and Development, Oxford University Press.

United Nations Development Programme ( 2010 ) Human Development Index and its constituents, accessed 7th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Tables_reprint.pdf

United States Energy Information Administration ( 2010 ) Crude Oil and Total Petroleum Imports Top 15 states, accessed 7th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html

World Bank ( 2010 ) Gross national income per capita 2009, Atlas method and PPP, accessed 7th January 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GNIPC.pdf