Reflection of Truth Essay
Knowledge has a close relationship with truth as for belief to be knowledge. it must be true. Therefore. it is necessary to understand the being of truth in order to hold a deeper apprehension of cognition. Therefore. this contemplation will demo the definition of “truth” for me and its features in different civilization or groups of people. “Truth” itself is defined as “success in inquiry” by John Randall. The definition may besides intend “verification” and it comprises all the three definitions of truth presented by The Correspondence. Coherence and Pragmatic Theories of Truth.
The “success” means conveying scientific solution from the critical employment of the best method that we can develop to work out the “inquiry” . the world’s jobs. Therefore. the “success” is worked out “through action” ( in Dewey’s words ) and it fulfills the standards of truth as an understanding with fact or world in the Correspondence Theory of Truth. The success must besides be verified by our old organic structure of cognition as a success ( or a solution ) to a job that will be acknowledged by the society who understands the job in the long tally. Therefore. the “Truth” corresponds to the Coherence Theory of Truth.
Last. the “truth’ brings utile and helpful solutions or replies to jobs therefore ; it besides renders the Pragmatic Theory of Truth to be a fulfilled standard. Therefore. a true belief must give solutions or replies to people’s jobs and is acceptable by the people’s organic structure of cognition. every bit good as. practical in their lives. An illustration of a true belief is a faith. The faith is a truth for a certain group of people who hold religion over the faith as it is acceptable by their cognition formed through life experience. They besides see the faith as the replies to their jobs or inquiries about their beings in the universe.
Hence. faith brings values or solutions to this group of people. It teaches them values that are accepted as facts such as “killing guiltless people is a sin” and this correspondence of faith values to world shows religion’s conformance to facts. Therefore. truth may differ from one civilization to another. as what may profit or reply the jobs of a specific group of people. may non be utile for another group. Religions are the illustration. The truth in Christian belief that Eden is the life after decease do non synchronise with the truth in Buddhist stating that human supports transmigrating until flawlessness is achieved.
Then. it is besides apprehensible that all these “truths” based on faiths can be true at the same clip eventhough they may non be all true for a specific person. However. there is besides a possibility that all these “truths” are false. It happens when during an individual’s decease. nil dramatic like reincarnation or the gap of the Heaven’s Gates really occurs as this statement renders faiths. with its values. to be useless and non matching to the facts. Ultimately. the false truths ( in this instance the faiths ) can non be considered as truth anymore for. fundamentally. they are non true.
The possibility of false truth to be so arises a inquiry of whether truth does really be or that there is no truth at all. If all truths are false so there is no truth any longer and if truths are comparative from one group to another. is there an aim truth? For a “truth” as “verification” may be a mere prevarication invented by a group of people to act upon others. Then. the confirmation is non a truth any longer for the discoverers know the existent fact of the truth as a mere prevarication. Another statement is the fiction narrative in a book.
The narrative may be utile to the populace or carry through the standards of the Three Theories of Truth but. still. people would ne’er see a fictional narrative as truth. would non they? The narrative may depict a factual incidence that can go on in a existent life. give utile solutions or replies to the jobs in life. every bit good as. present a new scientific theory that is relevant to our organic structure of cognition. However. can the narrative be accepted as a true narrative? A fictional narrative will stay a antic imaginativeness of the author merely.
Therefore. it is shown that the three Theories of Truth are flawed and so. is it appropriate to utilize them in finding what is the truth? Despite all these statements. I still can non claim that there is no truth. If I province that there is no truth. so. I would possess no cognition for cognition comes from true belief. Furthermore. without cognition. what are the bases on which I put my statements on claiming that there is no truth? I would merely declare sentiments which are unknown to myself because I have non even the slightest cognition about those sentiments.
Hence. I believe that there is truth for cognition does be. However. I can be certain that nonsubjective truth will ne’er be accomplishable by human as we are societal existences and our positions are affected by each other. We besides have feelings and emotions that will impede us from obtaining the nonsubjective truth. The truth is comparative to our societies. Furthermore. as the three Theories of Truth are questionable. I believe that people can non grok “truth” wholly at this phase and so. possibly. the journey in happening the existent truth and cognition is still a long manner to travel.
